Cases 21 - 30 of 149
Carter v. Trani et al
as 1:2017cv01288
Petitioner:
Joseph Scott Carter
Respondent:
Travis Trani, Rick Raemisch and Cynthia Coffman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sayed v. Trani, et al
as 17-1096
Petitioner - Appellant:
HAZHAR A. SAYED
Respondent - Appellee:
TRAVIS TRANI and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Glaser v. Trani, et al
as 17-1087
Petitioner - Appellant:
DOUGLAS A. GLASER
Respondent - Appellee:
TRAVIS TRANI and CYNTHIA H. COFFMAN, Attorney General of the State of Colorado
Newland v. Trani, et al
as 17-1046
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOSEPH SAUL NEWLAND
Respondent - Appellee:
TRAVIS TRANI, LOU ARCHULETA and CYNTHIA COFFMAN, Attorney General of the State of Colorado
In re: Newland
as 17-1045
Petitioner:
JOSEPH SAUL NEWLAND
Respondent:
TRAVIS TRANI, LOU ARCHULETA and CYNTHIA COFFMAN, Attorney General of the State of Colorado
Lebere v. Trani, et al
as 16-1499
Petitioner - Appellant:
KENT ERIC LEBERE
Respondent - Appellee:
TRAVIS TRANI, Warden and COLORADO ATTORNEY GENERAL, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Gibson v. DOK
as 1:2016cv02959
Plaintiff:
MichaelBeau K. Gibson
Defendant:
DOK, Rick Raemisch, Dave Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Newland v. Trani et al
as 1:2016cv02642
Petitioner:
Joseph Saul Newland
Respondent:
Travis Trani , Lou Archuleta and Cynthia Coffman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lowe v. Raemisch, et al
as 16-1300
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DONNIE LOWE
Defendant - Appellant:
RICK RAEMISCH, in his individual and official capacitites as Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Corrections and TRAVIS TRANI, Warden, Colorado State Penitentiary, in his individual and official capacities
Mishra v. Trani, et al
as 16-1278
Petitioner - Appellant:
BIKRAM MISHRA
Respondent - Appellee:
TRAVIS TRANI, Warden and CYNTHIA COFFMAN, Attorney General of the State of Colorado
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
