Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Savett v. Whirlpool Corporation et al
as 1:2012cv00310
Plaintiff:
Adam Savett
Defendant:
Whirlpool Corporation and Home Depot, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv02680
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00383
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617
Office Depot, Inc. v. IMPACT OFFICE PRODUCTS, LLC et al
as 1:2009cv02791
Plaintiff:
Office Depot, Inc.
Defendant:
IMPACT OFFICE PRODUCTS, LLC, Patrick J. Lavelle and BRIAN KYLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv02737
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv02740
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
DDR Southeast Valley Park, L.L.C. v. Office Depot, Inc.
as 1:2009cv02233
Plaintiff:
DDR Southeast Valley Park, L.L.C. and DDR Southeast Valley Park, L.L.C.
Defendant:
Office Depot, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Buffalo-Ithaca Associates, LLC v. Office Depot, Inc.
as 1:2009cv02118
Plaintiff:
Buffalo-Ithaca Associates, LLC
Defendant:
Office Depot, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Invacare Corporation v. Medical Depot, Inc.
as 1:2009cv01677
Plaintiff:
Invacare Corporation
Defendant:
Medical Depot, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv01239
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
