Cases 21 - 30 of 37
Lovingood et al v. MI Windows and Doors, Inc.
as 1:2012cv04369
Plaintiff:
James R. Lovingood and Gail E. Loder
Defendant:
MI Windows and Doors, Inc.
OVERHEAD DOOR CORPORATION v. BURGER
as 1:2012cv00101
Plaintiff:
OVERHEAD DOOR CORPORATION
Defendant:
WILLIAM H BURGER
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Hightower et al v. Open Door Home, Inc.
as 4:2012cv00079
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Hightower , Teresa Allen , John Davenport and others
Defendant:
Open Door Home, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Johnson v. M.I. Windows and Doors, Inc.
as 4:2012mc00003
Plaintiff:
Nadine Johnson
Defendant:
M.I. Windows and Doors, Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00034
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452
Putman v. City of Atlanta et al
as 1:2010cv03243
Plaintiff:
Christopher M. Putman
Defendant:
City of Atlanta , Anwar T. Bradley and Red Door Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443
D. H. Pace Company, Inc. v. American Overhead Garage Doors, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv01523
Plaintiff:
D. H. Pace Company, Inc.
Defendant:
American Overhead Garage Doors, Inc. and Joel Cobb
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Auto-Owners Insurance Company v. Butler et al
as 1:2010cv00143
Plaintiff:
Auto-Owners Insurance Company
Defendant:
Devon Butler, Alma Jones, Malaker Jones and others
Banks v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv03476
Plaintiff:
Elbert Banks and Elbert Banks
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Wal-Mart Stores East, LP and others
ThirdParty Defendant:
Southern Acquisitions, LLC
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
Sam's East, Inc.
Dyer v. Wayne's Overhead Doors, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv00086
Plaintiff:
Frankie Allen Dyer
Defendant:
Wayne's Overhead Doors, Inc., Wayne's Overhead Doors, Inc. and John Doe(s)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
