Cases 21 - 30 of 54
Morgan v. United States et al
as 5:2018cv01064
Defendant:
Governor of Oklahoma, Oklahoma County Prosecutor, United States of America and others
Plaintiff:
David Brian Morgan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Avila v. United States of America et al
as 5:2018cv00882
Petitioner:
Mario Avila
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, United States of America and B Greilick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Borrero v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 5:2017cv01185
Petitioner:
Lazaro D. Borrero
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Borrero v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 6:2017cv00398
Petitioner:
Lazaro D. Borrero
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Atwood v. United States of America et al
as 5:2017cv00629
Plaintiff:
David Garland Atwood, II
Defendant:
United States of America, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Dr Zeavin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hall v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 5:2016cv01346
Petitioner:
Sharee Martell Hall
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Denoyer v. US Parole Commission et al
as 5:2016cv00545
Petitioner:
DALE ERNEST DENOYER
Respondent:
US Parole Commission, United States Attorney General, United States Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Porter v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2016cv00393
Plaintiff:
Leslie Wilford Porter
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and FNU Jarvis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kirtman v. Grismer et al
as 5:2016cv00386
Plaintiff:
Derrick Eugene Kirtman
Defendant:
Margaret Grismer, Todd Lawrence, Katherine Demer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chen v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2015cv01246
Plaintiff:
John Chen
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and United States Marshal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
