Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Pyles et al v. P.A.M. Transportation Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00447
Plaintiff:
John M Pyles and Marcia Pyles
Defendant:
P.A.M. Transportation Services, Inc., Love's Travel Stops and Country Stores, Inc. and Great American Insurance Company
Cross_claimant:
Love's Travel Stops and Country Stores, Inc.
Cross_defendant:
P.A.M. Transportation Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00414
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Boost Worldwide, Inc. v. One Stop Liquors
as 5:2012cv00193
Plaintiff:
Boost Worldwide, Inc
Defendant:
One Stop Liquors
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
Kroger Co. et al v. Excentus Corporation
as 1:2010cv00161
Plaintiff:
Kroger Co. , Kroger Limited Partnership I , Kroger Co. of Michigan and others
Defendant:
Excentus Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv01176
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Non-Stop Digital Services Central, LLC et al v. Keystone International Holdings, LLC et al
as 2:2009cv00248
Plaintiff:
Non-Stop Digital Services Central, LLC, Glenn Sigler and Michael Petro
Defendant:
Keystone International Holdings, LLC, Keystone International Holdings, LLC, Gordon Stone and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Copeland v. I.R.S. ACS Support-Stop 813G
as 5:2008cv02768
Plaintiff:
Charles D. Copeland
Defendant:
I.R.S. ACS Support-Stop 813G
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Universal Delaware, Inc. v. Comdata Corporation
as 1:2008mc00079
Plaintiff:
Universal Delaware, Inc.
Defendant:
Comdata Corporation
Interested Party:
TA Operating LLC, TA Operating LLC, Petro Stopping Centers, L.P. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
