Cases 21 - 30 of 171
GRINNAGE v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION et al
as 1:2017cv02424
Petitioner:
ROBERT GRINNAGE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION, J. PATRICIA WILSON SMOOT, PATRICIA K. CUSHWA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MATTHEWS v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
as 1:2017cv01916
Petitioner:
JAMES D. MATTHEWS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
WATSON v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
as 1:2017cv01734
Petitioner:
CURTIS LEE WATSON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
VENABLE v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2017cv01689
Plaintiff:
MACARTHUR VENABLE
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION, WARDEN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
MORTON v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION et al
as 1:2017cv01112
Plaintiff:
WALTER BERNARD MORTON, JR.
Defendant:
J. PATRICIA WILSON-SMOOT, MARK TANNER, SCOTT KUDIC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KITTRELL v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
as 1:2017cv01014
Petitioner:
JAMES E. KITTRELL
Respondent:
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00222
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
TURNER v. PETERSON et al
as 1:2016cv02103
Plaintiff:
CLINT TURNER
Defendant:
CHARLES PETERSON and UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
HARE v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION et al
as 1:2016cv01815
Petitioner:
GEORGE E. HARE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION and PATRICIA WILSON SMOOT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MALLOY v. DC SUPERIOR COURT et al
as 1:2016cv01785
Petitioner:
GERALD JAMES MALLOY
Respondent:
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
