Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Paris v. Griffin
as 18-1526
Petitioner - Appellant:
Theodore Paris
Respondent - Appellee:
Thomas Griffin, Superintendent of the Green Haven Correctional Facility
Miller v. New York State Department of C
as 18-1513
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Daniel Miller, Stephen M. Jacks, Eugene Randolph and others
Defendant - Appellee:
New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, NYSDOCCS, Anthony J. Annucci, Acting Commissioner, NYSDOCCS, Carl J. Koenigsmann, MD, Deputy Commissioner & Chief Medical Officer, NYSDOCCS and others
Vann v. Griffin
as 18-1383
Petitioner - Appellant:
Kouriockein Vann
Respondent - Appellee:
Thomas Griffin, Superintendent
Miller v. Annucci
as 18-1243
Plaintiff:
Mary Miller
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Daniel Miller, Eugene Randolph and Eugene Mazzio
Defendant - Appellee:
Anthony J. Annucci, Acting Commissioner, NYSDOCCS, James A. O'Gorman, Acting Deputy commissioner, Thomas Griffin, Superintendent and others
Jones v. Lee
as 18-499
Petitioner - Appellant:
Leon Jones
Respondent - Appellee:
Thomas Griffin, Superintendent of Green Haven Correctional Facility
Garcia v. Annucci
as 17-3302
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Alex Garcia
Defendant - Appellee:
J. Annucci, DOCCS Commissioner and Thomas Griffin, Superintendent of GHCF
Lopez v. Griffin
as 17-2389
Petitioner:
Adrian Lopez
Respondent:
Thomas Griffin, Superintendent, Green Haven Correctional Facility Superintendent
Hurtado v. Griffin
as 17-1805
Petitioner - Appellant:
Bernardo Hurtado
Respondent - Appellee:
Thomas Griffin, Superintendent
Best v. Griffin
as 16-2971
Petitioner - Appellant:
Sean Best
Respondent - Appellee:
Thomas Griffin, Superintendent, Green Haven Correctional Facility
Washington v. Griffin
as 15-3831
Petitioner - Appellant:
Kenneth Washington
Respondent - Appellee:
Thomas Griffin, Superintendent, Sullivan Correctional Facility
Amicus Curiae:
The Innocence Project
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
