Cases 21 - 26 of 26
PICAYUNE RANCHERIA OF THE CHUKCHANSI INDIANS v. STEVENS et al
as 1:2013cv00411
Defendant:
TRACIE STEVENS , JO-ANNE SHYLOSKI , MARIA GETOFF and others
Plaintiff:
PICAYUNE RANCHERIA OF THE CHUKCHANSI INDIANS , DIXIE JACKSON , HAROLD HAMMOND, SR and others
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 2701 Indian Gaming Regulatory Act
CITY OF DULUTH v. NATIONAL INDIAN GAMING COMMISSION et al
as 1:2013cv00246
Plaintiff:
CITY OF DULUTH
Defendant:
NATIONAL INDIAN GAMING COMMISSION and TRACIE STEVENS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv03782
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Think Computer Corp v. Venchiarutti et al
as 5:2011cv05496
Defendant:
Robert Venchiarutti, William Haraf, Traci Stevens and others
Plaintiff:
Think Computer Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Neighbors of Casino San Pablo, et al v. Kenneth Salazar, et al
as 11-5136
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Neighbors of Casino San Pablo, an unincorporated association, Andres Soto, Anne Ruffino and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Kenneth Lee Salazar, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Interior, Larry Echo Hawk, in his official capacity as Assistant Secretary of the Interior - Indian Affairs, National Indian Gaming Commission and others
Intervenor - Appellee:
Lytton Rancheria Of California, a federally organized Indian Tribe, also known as Lytton Band Of Pomo Indians
CLARK COUNTY, WASHINGTON et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR et al
as 1:2011cv00278
Plaintiff:
CLARK COUNTY, WASHINGTON , CITY OF VANCOUVER, WASHINGTON , CITIZENS AGAINST RESERVATION SHOPPING (CARS) and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR , KENNETH SALAZAR , BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS and others
Movant:
COWLITZ INDIAN TRIBE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
