Cases 21 - 30 of 309
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv01018
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Oscar et al v. United States of America et al
as 5:2022cv00256
Plaintiff:
Jean E. Oscar, Katherine Wenzel, Wendy Lacey and others
Defendant:
United States of America, Mocospace, U.S. Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lamm v. U.S. Attorney Generals Office
as 5:2022cv00249
Plaintiff:
Devin Eric Lamm
Defendant:
U.S. Attorney Generals Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv00764
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1447 Hearings on denials of applications for naturalization
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv00520
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Gayden v. Lane
as 5:2022cv00104
Petitioner:
John Matthew Gayden, Jr.
Respondent:
Kathy P. Lane and U.S. Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Gayden v. Lane
as 8:2022cv00390
Petitioner:
John Matthew Gayden, Jr.
Respondent:
Kathy P. Lane and U.S. Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv00031
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv14505
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv01285
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
