Cases 21 - 30 of 42
Shoemake et al v. United States of America - U.S. Postal Service
as 5:2019cv00336
Defendant:
United States of America - U.S. Postal Service
Plaintiff:
James Shoemake, Sr. and Sharon Shoemake
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 875
Temo et al v. United States of America
as 8:2019cv00259
Defendant:
United States of America - U.S. Postal Service
Plaintiff:
Janine Temo and Charles Temo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Armstead v. Rubio et al
as 6:2018cv00584
Plaintiff:
Brenda C. Armstead
Defendant:
Marco Rubio, Fred Conley, U.S. Postal Service and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shaw v. Brennan et al
as 6:2016cv00278
Plaintiff:
Phillip W. Shaw
Defendant:
Megan J. Brennan, Postmaster General, U.S. Postal Service and National Association of Letter Carriers
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Ambrose v. U.S. Postal Service
as 1:2014cv22489
Plaintiff:
Yolanda E. Ambrose
Defendant:
U.S. Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. U.S. Postal Service
as 0:2014cv60714
Plaintiff:
Vanessa V. Jones
Defendant:
U.S. Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2013cv01748
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2013cv02337
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Smith v. Chairman of the Postal Service Board of Governors for the U.S. Postal Service
as 6:2013cv00516
Plaintiff:
Dontavious Sherrode Smith
Defendant:
Chairman of the Postal Service Board of Governors for the U.S. Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Caldwell v. U.S. Postal Service
as 1:2013cv20313
Plaintiff:
Emmett W. Caldwell
Defendant:
U.S. Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
