Cases 21 - 30 of 66
Eldridge v. Cerliano et al
as 6:2018cv00059
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Allison Eldridge
Defendant:
Maxey Cerliano and US Marshal Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Altschul v. United States of America et al
as 1:2018cv00034
Petitioner:
Todd Warren Altschul
Respondent:
United States of America, US Marshal Service, US Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Salazar et al v. United States of America et al
as 7:2017cv00162
Plaintiff:
Jose De Jesus Salazar and Maria Minerva Salazar
Defendant:
United States of America, Unknown US Marshals Agents and Jeff Sessions
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271
Christopher v. Coastal Bend Detention Center et al
as 2:2016cv00516
Plaintiff:
Julius Calvin Christopher
Defendant:
Coastal Bend Detention Center, Correct Care Solutions, Inc., GEO Group, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Faseler v. Coastal Bend Detention Center et al
as 2:2016cv00457
Plaintiff:
Michael Faseler
Defendant:
Coastal Bend Detention Center and US Marshal
Consol_defendant:
Correct Care Solutions
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rafiq v. Chief US Marshal et al
as 3:2016cv02922
Plaintiff:
Mohammad Rafiq
Defendant:
Chief US Marshal, Warden FCI Elkton and DSCC Director
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howard v. Chief US Marshal et al
as 3:2016cv02806
Plaintiff:
Baby Boy Howard
Defendant:
Chief US Marshal, Warden FCI Elkton and DSCC Director
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Horton v. Chief US Marshal et al
as 3:2016cv02805
Plaintiff:
Jerrod Horton
Defendant:
Chief US Marshal, Warden FCI Elkton and DSCC Director
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fagin v. Chief US Marshal et al
as 3:2016cv02737
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Fagin
Defendant:
Chief US Marshal, Warden FCI Elkton and DSCC Director
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morris v. Chief US Marshal et al
as 3:2016cv02758
Plaintiff:
Dexter Luther Morris, Jr
Defendant:
Chief US Marshal, Warden FCI Elkton and DSCC Director
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
