Cases 21 - 30 of 366
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv10872
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Barranco et al v. University of Michigan Board of Regents
as 2:2023cv10646
Plaintiff:
Ross Barranco and Katie Shier
Defendant:
University of Michigan Board of Regents
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv10631
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Vyletel v. University of Michigan - Dearborn et al
as 2:2022cv13067
Plaintiff:
Matthew P. Vyletel
Defendant:
University of Michigan - Dearborn, Eric Kirklin, Shawn Simone and others
John Doe v. Board of Regents of the University of Michigan, et al
as 22-2095
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN DOE, M.D.
Defendant / Appellee:
BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN, MARIE LOZON, M.D. and JUSTIN DIMICK, M.D.
William Ashford v. University of Michigan, et al
as 22-2057
Plaintiff / Appellee:
WILLIAM ELLIOTT ASHFORD
Defendant / Appellant:
UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN, UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN-DEARBORN, GARY GORSKI and others
Vyletel v. University of Michigan - Dearborn
as 2:2022cv12744
Plaintiff:
Matthew P. Vyletel
Defendant:
University of Michigan - Dearborn
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1945
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Kerchen et al v. University of Michigan et al
as 4:2022cv12492
Defendant:
University of Michigan, James H Woods, Christian Raphalides and others
Plaintiff:
Heather Kerchen, Lori Kerchen and Dale Kerchen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Vyletel v. University of Michigan et al
as 2:2022cv12485
Plaintiff:
Matthew P. Vyletel
Defendant:
University of Michigan and University of Michigan, Regents of
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
