Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 34
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-2653
Plaintiff - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-2178
Plaintiff - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-1492
Plaintiff - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-1296
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Rafeek Yussef v. Warden Pike County Correctiona, et al
as 16-4372
Plaintiff - Appellant: RAFEEK YUSSEF
Defendant - Appellee: WARDEN PIKE COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, THOMAS DECKER, in his official capacity as Philadelphia Field Office Director for Detention and Removal, ACTING ASSISTANT SECRETARY USICE and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-3773
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Walter Brown v. Warden Pike County Correctiona, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-3685
Plaintiff - Appellant: WALTER BROWN
Defendant - Appellee: WARDEN PIKE COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, SGT. FRAWLEY and E. WENZEL, Grievance Coordinator
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-2241
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Harjit Singh v. Warden Pike County Correctiona, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-1017
Plaintiff - Appellant: HARJIT SINGH
Defendant - Appellee: WARDEN PIKE COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, THOMAS DECKER, Philadelphia Office, USICE, SARAH R. SALDANA and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-3626
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?