Cases filed in Maine
Cases 21 - 30 of 30
DANIEL v. AVESTA HOUSING MANAGEMENT CORPORATION et al
as 2:2012mc00266
Plaintiff: DAVID DANIEL
Defendant: AVESTA HOUSING MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, SCOTCH HILL ASSOCIATES LP, CRYSTAL CHAMBERLAIN and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00159
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
DANIEL v. AVESTA HOUSING MANAGEMENT CORPORATION et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv00110
Plaintiff: DAVID DANIEL
Defendant: AVESTA HOUSING MANAGEMENT CORPORATION , SCOTCH HILL ASSOCIATES LP , CRYSTAL CHAMBERLAIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
HILL v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 2:2011cv00140
Plaintiff: JOHN HILL
Defendant: JOHNSON & JOHNSON, ORTHO-MCNEIL PHARMACEUTICAL INC, ORTHO-MCNEIL-JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HILL v. PFIZER INC et al
as 2:2009cv00646
Plaintiff: ROBERT HILL
Defendant: PFIZER INC , PHARMACIA CORPORATION and GD SEARLE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
USA v. HILL
as 1:2009mc00259
Petitioner: USA
Respondent: PATRICIA HILL
USA v. HILL
as 1:2009mc00260
Petitioner: USA
Respondent: GERALD HILL
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv00575
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Other Statutes None
HILL v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
as 1:2009cv00260
Plaintiff: BONITA HILL
Defendant: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
MICHAUD v. HEATHER HILL MANAGEMENT CO et al
as 1:2008cv00109
Plaintiff: REGINALD R MICHAUD
Defendant: HEATHER HILL MANAGEMENT CO, COMMISSIONER, HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and SOCIAL SECURITY ADM
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Civil Rights None

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?