Cases 21 - 30 of 428
Otufale v. FCI Memphis
as 2:2024cv02510
Petitioner:
Oluwagbemiga Otufale
Respondent:
US Department of Justice, Warden Harrison, FCI Memphis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Loyde v. Phillips
as 3:2024cv00852
Respondent:
Warden Shawn Phillips
Petitioner:
Mack Mandrell Loyde
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Peachey v. Harrison
as 2:2024cv02483
Petitioner:
Nathan Peachey
Respondent:
Warden C. Harrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Mock v. Holloway
as 3:2024cv00724
Petitioner:
Brian Ray Mock
Respondent:
Warden James M. Holloway
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brewer v. Harrison
as 2:2024cv02305
Petitioner:
Cherosco Brewer
Defendant:
Warden Harrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Dowdy v. Vantell et al
as 3:2024cv00509
Plaintiff:
Antwion Dowdy
Defendant:
Warden Vincent Vantell, Core Civic, Inc., f/n/u Cockrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ardd v. Harrison
as 2:2024cv02324
Petitioner:
Nickey Ardd
Defendant:
Warden C. Harrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Robinson v. Harrison
as 2:2024cv02323
Respondent:
Warden C. Harrison
Petitioner:
Tony Dewayne Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lucas v. United States Department Of Justice et al
as 2:2024cv02319
Plaintiff:
Derek Lucas and Derek Lashun Lucas
Defendant:
United States Department Of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons, United States Warden at Federal Correctional Complex and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trujillo v. Harrison
as 2:2024cv02161
Petitioner:
Paul Trujillo
Respondent:
Warden Harrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
