Cases 21 - 30 of 2,630
Brown v. Warden Martell
as 8:2024cv03879
Respondent:
Warden Martell
Petitioner:
Wilbert E Brown and Wilbert Evans Brown, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pinkney v. Warden of Edgefield FCI
as 6:2024cv03868
Petitioner:
Roderick Pinkney
Respondent:
Warden of Edgefield FCI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
McCoy v. State of South Carolina, The
as 9:2024cv03808
Petitioner:
Damiane McCoy
Respondent:
Warden of Evans Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (County)
Josey v. Warden FCI Williamsburg
as 4:2024cv03779
Petitioner:
Nathaniel Josey
Respondent:
Warden FCI Williamsburg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Lisenby v. Warden of Edgefield FCI
as 5:2024cv03787
Petitioner:
Malik Al-Shabazz and Billy Lee Lisenby, Jr
Respondent:
Warden of Edgefield FCI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Baccus v. Wilson
as 9:2024cv03744
Respondent:
Warden of Evans Correctional Institution
Petitioner:
John Roosevelt Baccus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Oxendine v. Warden of Evans C.I.
as 2:2024cv03716
Respondent:
Warden of Evans C.I.
Petitioner:
Steven W. Oxendine
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hagood v. Warden Early
as 2:2024cv03668
Petitioner:
John Allen Hagood
Respondent:
Warden Early
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. State of South Carolina
as 4:2024cv03649
Petitioner:
Victor D. Smith
Respondent:
Warden Evans Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Wilson
as 6:2024cv03651
Petitioner:
Randy Johnson
Respondent:
Warden Broad River Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
