Cases 21 - 30 of 3,667
Henderson v. Muniz et al
as 2:2024cv00175
Petitioner:
Christopher Gene Henderson
Respondent:
Senior Warden David Muniz and Director, TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lang v. Ms. Brown et al
as 4:2024cv00788
Respondent:
Ms. Brown, Ms. Rebella, Mr. Contrell and others
Petitioner:
Barbara Lang
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Mosley v. Warden-FCI Beaumont Medium
as 1:2024cv00340
Petitioner:
Kentray Mosley
Respondent:
Warden-FCI Beaumont Medium
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Sanchez v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00118
Respondent:
FCI Texarkana Warden
Petitioner:
Juan Arriaga Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Gerrans v. Warden FCI La Tuna-Camp
as 3:2024cv00284
Respondent:
Warden FCI La Tuna-Camp
Petitioner:
Lawrence J. Gerrans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Vazquez-Avendano v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00116
Respondent:
FCI Texarkana Warden
Petitioner:
Omar Vazquez-Avendano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Adams v. Warden, FCI Three Rivers
as 2:2024cv00186
Plaintiff:
Curtis Wayne Adams
Defendant:
Warden, FCI Three Rivers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Franke v. Warden, FCI Beaumont Camp
as 1:2024cv00336
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Beaumont Camp
Petitioner:
Mark Franke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Flores v. Warden, FCI Beaumont
as 5:2024cv00183
Petitioner:
Esteneslasio Luis Flores
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Beaumont
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Solis v. Warden Rosales et al
as 3:2024cv02053
Plaintiff:
Humberto Solis, Jr
Defendant:
Warden Rosales, HSA Hodges and Officer Middleton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
