Cases 21 - 30 of 445
Ross v. U.S. et al
as 3:2024cv00386
Defendant:
Day Springs Family Care, Steve Lowe, UT Medical Neurosurgeons Knoxville, TN and others
Plaintiff:
Dennis Wayne Ross
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Armstead v. Harrison
as 2:2024cv02671
Respondent:
Warden Harrison
Petitioner:
Richard Armstead
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Chambers v. Adams
as 3:2024cv01114
Respondent:
Warden Robert Adams
Petitioner:
LaNorris O'Brien Chambers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
KIEL v. HARRISON
as 2:2024cv02646
Petitioner:
JAMES KIEL
Respondent:
WARDEN HARRISON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Renn v. Strada et al
as 3:2024cv01096
Plaintiff:
Rob Edward Renn
Defendant:
Well Path, (f/n/u) Watts, Trousdale Turner Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilberto v. Harrison
as 2:2024cv02633
Respondent:
Warden C. Harrison
Petitioner:
Vallecilla Gamboa Wilberto
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bledsoe v. Perry
as 3:2024cv01041
Petitioner:
Tavaris D. Bledsoe
Respondent:
Grady Perry, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gonzalez v. Harrison
as 2:2024cv02608
Petitioner:
Frederico Gonzalez
Respondent:
Warden C. Harrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Johnson v. Tennessee Department of Corrections/Corecivic Transportation et al
as 3:2024cv01015
Defendant:
Meharry Medical Cte., Dr. Seahorn - L.D.B.S.N., C.O. Brown and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moses v. Sexton et al
as 1:2024cv01173
Plaintiff:
James Moses
Defendant:
CoreCivic Medical Staff, Manager Futrell, Warden Sexton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
