Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 35
Darin Johnson v. Frank X. Chavez
as 12-55312
Petitioner / Appellant: DARIN JOHNSON
Respondent / Appellee: MICHAEL D. MCDONALD, Warden-HDSP and FRANK X. CHAVEZ, Warden-HDSP
Charles Daron v. Michael McDonald
as 11-57215
Petitioner - Appellant: CHARLES L. DARON
Respondent - Appellee: MICHAEL D. MCDONALD, Warden HDSP
Ames v. Virga et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2011cv03197
Plaintiff: Bryon Ames
Defendant: Tim Virga, Bachmann, Maria Melegrito and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Michael Smith v. State of California, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-17466
Plaintiff - Appellant: MICHAEL LENOIR SMITH
Defendant - Appellee: STATE OF CALIFORNIA, D. L. RUNNELS, Warden, HDSP, ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER and others
Michael Smith v. State of California, et al
as 11-16694
Plaintiff - Appellant: MICHAEL LENOIR SMITH
Defendant - Appellee: STATE OF CALIFORNIA, D. L. RUNNELS, Warden, HDSP, ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER and others
Isaiah Walker v. Michael McDonald
as 11-55846
Petitioner - Appellant: ISAIAH W. WALKER
Respondent - Appellee: MICHAEL D. MCDONALD, Warden-HDSP
Nathaniel Jackson v. Michael McDonald
as 11-55161
Petitioner - Appellant: NATHANIEL T. JACKSON
Respondent - Appellee: MICHAEL MCDONALD, Warden-HDSP
Michael Malone v. Tom Felker, et al
as 10-16612
Petitioner - Appellant: MICHAEL MALONE
Respondent - Appellee: TOM FELKER, Acting Warden, HDSP and MATTHEW C. KRAMER, Warden
Malcolm Gray v. Howard Skolnik, et al
as 10-15962
Plaintiff - Appellant: MALCOLM L. GRAY
Defendant - Appellee: HOWARD SKOLNIK, Director of NDOC, JAMES COX, Deputy Director, DOROTHY NASH HOLMES, Programs Administrator and others
Timothy Webb v. Glen Whorton, et al
as 10-15701
Plaintiff - Appellant: TIMOTHY E. WEBB
Defendant - Appellee: GLEN WHORTON, Director, NDOC, DOROTHY NASH-HOLMES, Program Administrator, JANE FORAKER-THOMPSON, Supervising Chaplain and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?