Cases 21 - 30 of 71
Boyd v. Ware State Prison
as 5:2023cv00006
Plaintiff:
Davious Boyd
Defendant:
Ware State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyd v. Ware State Prison
as 1:2022cv05164
Plaintiff:
Davious Boyd
Defendant:
Ware State Prison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyd v. Ware State Prison
as 1:2022cv05162
Plaintiff:
Davious Boyd
Defendant:
Ware State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anthony Ramon Penick v. Ware State Prison Department of Georgia
as 5:2022cv00076
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ramon Penick
Defendant:
Ware State Prison Department of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henry Hamilton v. Warden, Ware State Prison
as 22-14078
Petitioner / Appellant:
HENRY ALBERT HAMILTON
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN, WARE STATE PRISON
DENICK v. WARE STATE PRISON et al
as 5:2022cv00061
Plaintiff:
ANTONY RAMON DENICK and Anthony Ramon Penick
Defendant:
WARE STATE PRISON, WARDEN JOHN DOES, Mr. Thift and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DENICK v. WARE STATE PRISON et al
as 5:2022cv00372
Plaintiff:
ANTONY RAMON DENICK and ANTHONY RAMON PENICK
Defendant:
WARE STATE PRISON and WARDEN JOHN DOES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joshua Barlow v. Warden, et al
as 22-12506
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSHUA ARLINGTON BARLOW
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN, Reidsville State Prison, MS. SHARPE, Unit Manager, Reidsville State Prison, MR. SPIN, Unit Manager, Reidsville State Prison and others
Kilpatrick v. Ware State Prison
as 1:2021cv00757
Petitioner:
Adrian Kilpatrick
Respondent:
Ware State Prison and Jeff Coleman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
FEDD v. JOHNSON et al
as 5:2020cv00069
Defendant:
Asst. Warden Powell, Doe, VSP Officer Payne and others
Plaintiff:
LEVI ARTHUR FEDD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
