Cases 21 - 30 of 32
Wilder v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2013cv34036
Plaintiff:
Lora Wilder
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wilder v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2013cv34013
Plaintiff:
Kristi Wilder
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Moses et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 2:2013cv32974
Plaintiff:
Megan Moses , Michelle Dishon , Janet Hedges and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wilder et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv30245
Plaintiff:
Patricia Wilder and Ervin Wilder
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Escamilla et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv29861
Plaintiff:
Francisca Escamilla , Lorie Short , Kathryn Holt and others
Defendant:
C. R Bard, Inc. , Sofradim Production SAS and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wilder et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv29602
Plaintiff:
Charlotte Wilder and James Wilder
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Miller-Wilder v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv20853
Plaintiff:
Lucy Miller-Wilder
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wilder v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2013cv05159
Plaintiff:
Tonya Wilder
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wilder et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2012cv05410
Plaintiff:
Marguerite Denise Wilder and Donald Bart Wilder
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wilder v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv04821
Plaintiff:
Judy Ann Wilder
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc., Analytic Biosurgical Solutions, C. R. Bard, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
