Cases 21 - 30 of 145
Ested v. Lee
as 1:2016cv07008
Petitioner:
Roger Ested
Respondent:
William A. Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Urena v. The Department of Corrections and Community Supervision et al
as 1:2016cv09708
Plaintiff:
Christian Urena
Defendant:
The Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, Anthony Annucci, R. Coccuza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez v. Padgett et al
as 9:2016cv01334
Plaintiff:
Jose Rodriguez
Defendant:
D. Padgett, Magino, P. Barg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ward v. Lee et al
as 9:2016cv01224
Plaintiff:
William E. Ward, Jr.
Defendant:
William A. Lee, W. Webbe, J. Ferrier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. Padgett et al
as 2:2016cv04485
Defendant:
S.G.T. P. Barg, K. Colao, William A. Lee and others
Plaintiff:
Jose Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Tillotson et al
as 1:2016cv05420
Plaintiff:
Rendell Robinson
Defendant:
Gerald Tillotson, Glenn J. Trombly, John H. Conklin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Townsley v. New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision et al
as 1:2016cv03837
Plaintiff:
Tayden Townsley
Defendant:
New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision (DOCCS), Superintendent William A. Lee, Lieutenant Tokarz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rose v. Garritt et al
as 7:2016cv03624
Plaintiff:
Nakia Rose
Defendant:
O. Garritt, John Dole, Paul D. Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rivas v. Lee
as 2:2015cv07011
Respondent:
William A. Lee
Petitioner:
Rudi Rivas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Royster v. Lee
as 9:2015cv00790
Petitioner:
William Royster
Respondent:
William A. Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
