Cases 21 - 30 of 41
Martinez v. Allison et al
as 1:2011cv00293
Plaintiff:
Ronald F. Martinez
Defendant:
Kathleen Allison, Kent Clark, William J. Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SULLIVAN v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv78743
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM J. SULLIVAN, JR.
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION , JAMES R. COLSON and JAMES H. COLWELL
Thirdparty_defendant:
JAMES E. BURKE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Eddie Harris v. William Sullivan
as 10-55652
Petitioner - Appellant:
EDDIE HARRIS
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM J. SULLIVAN
Pedro Alonso Gonzales v. Robert Ayres et al
as 2:2010cv02903
Defendant:
Robert Ayres, PHD Echendu, PHD Echendu and others
Plaintiff:
Pedro Alonso Gonzales
SULLIVAN v. SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
as 2:2010cv34240
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM J. SULLIVAN, JR.
Defendant:
SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Thomas Lee Bell v. William J. Sullivan
as 2:2009cv05870
Petitioner:
Thomas Lee Bell
Respondent:
William J. Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Edward Throop v. Jeanne Woodford, et al
as 09-56068
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD ANTHONY THROOP
Defendant - Appellee:
JEANNE S. WOODFORD, Director CDCR, STUART RYAN, Former Warden, GEORGE GIURBINO, Former Warden and others
Tracy Foley v. B. Jolly, et al
as 09-16155
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TRACY ROMERO FOLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
B. JOLLY, R. WENCIKER, F. GONZALEZ and others
James Steven Cienfuegos v. William J. Sullivan
as 2:2009cv00643
Petitioner:
James Steven Cienfuegos
Respondent:
William J. Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SULLIVAN v. AMERICAN STANDARD, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv77987
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM J. SULLIVAN
Defendant:
AMERICAN STANDARD, INC., THE BUDD COMPANY, GARLOCK SEALING TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
