Cases 21 - 30 of 1,362
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03492
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Kailiang Chen v. Alejandro Mayorkas et al
as 2:2024cv03449
Plaintiff:
Kailiang Chen
Defendant:
Alexandro Mayorkas, Director Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Rosemary Langley Melville and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03347
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03345
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03180
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03206
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Austin v. Kia America, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv02251
Plaintiff:
George Jarvis Austin
Defendant:
Kia America, Inc., Epiq Global, Susan Illston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Austin v. ABC Legal Services, LLC
as 3:2024cv02249
Plaintiff:
George Jarvis Austin
Defendant:
ABC Legal Services, LLC, Susan Illston, Donna M. Ryu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Tong Chen et al v. Malik Mukhametkaliyeva et al
as 8:2024cv00835
Plaintiff:
Tong Chen and Xin Xie
Defendant:
Malik Mukhametkaliyeva, Veronika Mukhametkaliyeva, Saul Ramones and others
v. Naturalization Ceremony 04/23/2024
as 3:2024mc80088
Not Yet Classified:
Adriana Denisse Aguirre, Ali Marzoughi, Jonathan Galvez and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
