Cases 21 - 30 of 238
CHEN et al v. RON HIBACHI GRILL SUPREME BUFFET INC. et al
as 1:2023cv02591
Plaintiff:
DAN DAN CHEN, MEI FENG LIN, XUE RAN HUANG and others
Defendant:
RON HIBACHI GRILL SUPREME BUFFET INC. D/B/A HIBACHI GRILL SUPREME BUFFET, HE PING CHEN, QI YUN CHEN and others
CHEN v. GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK et al
as 2:2023cv02412
Plaintiff:
JOHN CHEN
Defendant:
GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, EXECUTOR OF THE COUNTY OF NEWWARK, ESSEX COUNTY JAIL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02349
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
MASTER GROUP INC. v. CHEN
as 2:2023cv02140
Plaintiff:
MASTER GROUP INC.
Defendant:
HIN CHEN
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1819 Default of Promissory Note
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02101
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
CHEN v. GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2023cv02109
Plaintiff:
JOHN CHEN
Defendant:
GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, ESSEX COUNTY EXECUTOR, ESSEX COUNTY JAIL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01726
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01443
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01443
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00439
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
