Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Martinez v. Aycock-West
as 7:2012cv04574
Plaintiff:
Juan Martinez
Defendant:
Aycock-West
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00015
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Maldonado et al v. Spoonbread Too Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv02748
Plaintiff:
Caritino Maldonado , Juan Martinez-Diaz , Simon Gonzalez Nicolas and others
Defendant:
Spoonbread Too Inc. and Norma Darden
Counter_claimant:
Norma Darden
Counter_defendant:
Simon Gonzalez Nicolas , Caritino Maldonado , Juan Martinez-Diaz and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Enriquez et al v. Room Service II, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv02410
Plaintiff:
Victoriano Enriquez , Juan Martinez , Feliciano Genis and others
Defendant:
Room Service II, Inc., Room Service, Inc., John Doe Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Martinez v. Lee
as 7:2010cv09019
Petitioner:
Juan Martinez
Respondent:
William A. Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Martinez v. Lee
as 1:2010cv09019
Petitioner:
Juan Martinez
Respondent:
William A. Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Perez et al v. Kalir Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 6:2009cv06008
Plaintiff:
Gildardo Ortiz Perez and Juan Martinez
Defendant:
Kalir Enterprises, Inc., Yardena Kalir and Oded Kalir
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Castro et al v. Spice Place, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv04657
Plaintiff:
Marlon Castro, Octavio Rangel, Martin Vasquez and others
Defendant:
Spice Place, Inc., Spice Ave, Inc., Bangkok Palace II, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Ortiz et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2007cv01201
Plaintiff:
Pedro Ortiz, Victor Rivera, Carmel Rangel, Jr. and others
Defendant:
City of New York, New York City Police Department and John Doe 1-6
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
