Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Cases 21 - 30 of 7,526
Thomas v. Green
as 0:2024cv00047
Petitioner: Tarell Thomas
Respondent: James David Green
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nolan v. Mazza
as 2:2024cv00061
Petitioner: Timothy Nolan
Respondent: Warden Kevin Mazza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sisco v. USA
as 7:2024cv00034
Petitioner: Eugene Sisco, III
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Sutton v. USA
as 2:2024cv00059
Petitioner: Randall Sutton
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Guzman v. USA
as 6:2024cv00050
Petitioner: Marco Guzman
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Dixon v. USP Big Sandy We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2024cv00033
Petitioner: Lenard Chauncy Dixon
Respondent: Warden, USP Big Sandy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Paris v. Mosley We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2024cv00049
Petitioner: Lamar Paris
Respondent: Jamie Mosley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hargis v. USA
as 5:2024cv00098
Petitioner: William Ray Hargis
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Forte v. North Point Training Center et al
as 5:2024cv00099
Plaintiff: Montrail Forte
Defendant: North Point Training Center, The State of Kentucky, Officer Chad Shearer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Martinez v. Warden FCI Ashland
as 0:2024cv00042
Petitioner: Jonathan Martinez
Respondent: Warden FCI Ashland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?