Cases 21 - 30 of 3,034
Scott v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
Linda Carol Scott
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Poling v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
Michael Jay Poling
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Hefner v. Commissioner of Social Security et al
as 5:2024cv00019
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Waynetta Mae Hefner
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Hughes v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00011
Plaintiff:
Maria Hughes
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Nitinthorn v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00039
Plaintiff:
Paul Saksari Nitinthorn
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Saxton v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00013
Plaintiff:
William Ray Saxton
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Ratliff v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
Flora A. Ratliff and Joey Ratliff
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Webb v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00006
Plaintiff:
Michael Gene Webb
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Lewis v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00004
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Michelle Lewis
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Miller v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00009
Plaintiff:
Richard Wayne Miller, II
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
