Cases 21 - 30 of 673
DERMANSKY v. SECURING AMERICA'S FUTURE ENERGY FOUNDATION
as 1:2023cv02209
Plaintiff:
JULIE Dermansky
Defendant:
SECURING AMERICA'S FUTURE ENERGY FOUNDATION
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
MARKOS v. COMPASS REAL ESTATE, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv02661
Plaintiff:
STEVEN LAMONT MARKOS
Defendant:
COMPASS REAL ESTATE, LLC, JENNIFER TOUCHETTE and COMPASS REAL ESTATE, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
LYNK MEDIA, LLC v. WASHINGTON NEWSPAPER PUBLISHING CO. LLC
as 1:2023cv02304
Plaintiff:
LYNK MEDIA, LLC
Defendant:
WASHINGTON NEWSPAPER PUBLISHING CO. LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2023cv01899
Plaintiff:
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC and STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC.
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
HOWARTH v. MCFADDEN PARTNERS et al
as 1:2023cv01964
Plaintiff:
MORGAN HOWARTH
Defendant:
MCFADDEN PARTNERS, MARK MCFADDEN, HUNTER MCFADDEN and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
CHAVERS v. HOWARD UNIVERSITY
as 1:2023cv01840
Plaintiff:
ESQ. CLAYBORNE E. CHAVERS, SR. and CLAYBORNE E. CHAVERS, SR.
Defendant:
HOWARD UNIVERSITY
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC v. DOE
as 1:2023cv02182
Plaintiff:
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC.
Defendant:
JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC v. DOE
as 1:2023cv02180
Plaintiff:
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC.
Defendant:
JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC v. DOE
as 1:2023cv02184
Plaintiff:
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC.
Defendant:
JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
TIMMER v. DAILY CALLER, INC.
as 1:2023cv01657
Plaintiff:
REED TIMMER
Defendant:
DAILY CALLER, INC.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
