Cases 21 - 30 of 9,527
Woesthaus v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv01131
Plaintiff:
Lynn Woesthaus
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSAOGC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
WHITE v. O'MALLEY
as 2:2024cv00135
Plaintiff:
RENEE LYNN WHITE
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Shelton v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv01318
Plaintiff:
Bruce Shelton
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
SMITH v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00304
Plaintiff:
BETH R. SMITH
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Frye v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00143
Plaintiff:
Yulanda Y. Frye
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Not Yet Classified:
General Counsel SSA (Court use only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Swihart v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
Timothy Swihart
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Not Yet Classified:
General Counsel SSA (Court use only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Velasco v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 2:2024cv00445
Plaintiff:
Marcela Clavel Velasco
Defendant:
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Virgil Kelley v. Martin O'Malley
as 24-1587
Plaintiff:
VIRGIL L. KELLEY
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, Commissioner of Social Security
Jonathan Cain v. Martin O'Malley
as 24-1590
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN D. CAIN
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, Commissioner of Social Security
Fields v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv02958
Plaintiff:
Wyatt Fields
Defendant:
Commissioner Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
