Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Illinois
Cases 21 - 30 of 44,610
Luckett v. Nurse Hannah et al
as 2:2024cv02100
Plaintiff: Jumarious Luckett
Defendant: Nurse Hannah, Nurse Michelle, Liz DeLong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plowman v. Baker et al
as 4:2024cv04080
Plaintiff: Steven Plowman
Defendant: Melissa Baker, Wexford Health Sources Inc, Bommiasami Veerasikku and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Doe et al
as 1:2024cv02029
Plaintiff: Robert Christopher Adams and Miles
Defendant: John Doe, Tom Dart and City of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Payne v. Washington et al
as 1:2024cv01174
Plaintiff: Kraig Payne
Defendant: . Washington, . Leflare and . Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Patrick v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv50165
Petitioner: Lonzo Patrick
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Larive et al v. Doe
as 1:2024cv03585
Plaintiff: Shannon Larive and Metropolitan Correction Center
Defendant: John Officer Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hancock v. Unknown
as 3:2024cv01210
Plaintiff: Jimmy Hancock
Defendant: Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Annamalai v. BOP et al
as 3:2024cv01207
Plaintiff: Annamalai Annamalai and Swamiji Sri Selvam Siddhar
Defendant: BOP, USA, S Holem and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Richardson v. Green
as 4:2024cv04079
Petitioner: Jim L. Richardson
Respondent: Brittany Green
Not Yet Classified: Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Luedtke v. Lilliard
as 3:2024cv01197
Petitioner: James Luedtke
Respondent: T Lilliard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?