Cases 21 - 30 of 65,601
Sorptive Minerals Institute v. Mine Safety & Health Adm., et al
as 24-1889
Petitioner:
Sorptive Minerals Institute
Respondent:
Mine Safety and Health Adminstration and Julie A. Su, Acting Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1885
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Khyre Holbert v. United States
as 24-1893
Petitioner:
Khyre Holbert
Respondent:
United States of America
Gary Zierke, Jr. v. United States
as 24-1895
Petitioner:
Gary Zierke, Jr.
Respondent:
United States of America
United States v. Oleyesa Tiegs
as 24-1896
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Oleyesa A. Tiegs
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00304
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Sanford et al v. Morris et al
as 6:2024cv03124
Plaintiff:
David Sanford, Drew Sanford, Revocable Trust Agreement of David K. Sanford and others
Defendant:
Jim Morris, Paul Freeman, TRock Holdings, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Nineteenseventynine LLC et al v. ASR Group International, Inc. et al
as 0:2024cv01525
Plaintiff:
Nineteenseventynine LLC doing business as Breakfast Joynt, The and Sublime Surprise LLC doing business as Hot Java
Defendant:
ASR Group International, Inc., American Sugar Refining, Inc., Domino Foods, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Behm v. General Motors LLC
as 0:2024cv01517
Plaintiff:
Michael Behm
Defendant:
General Motors LLC, OnStar, LLC and LexisNexis Risk Solutions Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
