Cases 21 - 30 of 26,399
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02640
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Dai et al v. SAS Institute Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv02537
Plaintiff:
Hanson Dai, Max Chiswick, Adolph Robles and others
Defendant:
SAS Institute Inc., Ideas Inc., Choice Hotels International Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
In the Matter of the Administrative Inspection of Rita R. Thakur, M.D., Weightwise & Family Practice, 636 E. Santa Clara Street, San Jose, California 95112
as 5:2024mc80100
Not Yet Classified:
In the Matter of the Administrative Inspection of Rita R. Thakur, M.D., Weightwise & Family Practice, 636 E. Santa Clara Street, San Jose, California 95112
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
Rita R. Thakur, M.D.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02638
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Palma v. Wells Fargo Bank, National Association
as 3:2024cv02618
Plaintiff:
Helen Palma
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024mc80101
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02639
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Yoon et al v. Meta Platforms, Inc.
as 5:2024cv02612
Plaintiff:
Mary Yoon, William Martin and Kat Walker
Defendant:
Meta Platforms, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Zuckerman v. Meta Platforms, Inc.
as 3:2024cv02596
Plaintiff:
Ethan Zuckerman
Defendant:
Meta Platforms, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
