Cases 21 - 30 of 276
Kelly v. US Bank
as 3:2023cv00625
Plaintiff:
Dolores Kelly
Defendant:
US Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Kelly v. Bezos
as 3:2023cv00627
Plaintiff:
Dolores Kelly
Defendant:
Jeff Bezos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 at Fed. Question: Anti-trust
Cartwright v. People of The State of Colorado et al
as 3:2023cv00116
Plaintiff:
Shondel Inez Cartwright
Defendant:
People of The State of Colorado, Colorado Department of Corrections, Colorado State Board of Parole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985 Conspiracy to interfere with civil rights
Collier v. Collier et al
as 3:2023cv00170
Plaintiff:
Irina Collier
Defendant:
Charles Wade Collier and Ideas Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ra Fed. Question: Racketeering (RICO) Act
Reiner v. Navarette et al
as 3:2021cv02077
Plaintiff:
Mark Reiner and Martin Reiner
Defendant:
Jorge Navarette, Tom Zhang, Tani Cantil-Sakauye and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Civil Remedies: Racketeering (RICO) Act
Tirgari v. Kazemipour et al
as 3:2022cv00541
Plaintiff:
Reza Tirgari
Defendant:
Reza Kazemipour, 1792 Partners Inc., 1792 Partners General Partnership and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Civil Remedies: Racketeering (RICO) Act
City of Chula Vista et al v. Mckinsey and Company, Inc.
as 3:2022cv01661
Plaintiff:
City of Chula Vista, California and The People of the State of California
Defendant:
Mckinsey and Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Civil Remedies: Racketeering (RICO) Act
County of Imperial et al v. Mckinsey and Company, Inc.
as 3:2022cv01660
Plaintiff:
County of Imperial and The People of the State of California
Defendant:
Mckinsey and Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Civil Remedies: Racketeering (RICO) Act
County of San Diego et al v. Mckinsey and Company, Inc.
as 3:2022cv01624
Plaintiff:
County of San Diego and The People of the State of California
Defendant:
Mckinsey and Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Civil Remedies: Racketeering (RICO) Act
Huntley et al v. Rosebud Economic Development Corporation et al
as 3:2022cv01172
Plaintiff:
Katey Huntley and Gary Jackson
Defendant:
Rosebud Economic Development Corporation, Rosebud Lending LZO doing business as Zocaloans, Fintech Financial, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227 FCC-Unsolicited Telephone Sales
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
