Cases 21 - 30 of 69,181
Baker v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2024cv00160
Petitioner:
Thomas C. Baker
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Banks v. Warden-FCI Beaumont
as 1:2024cv00161
Petitioner:
Danny Lee Banks
Respondent:
Warden-FCI Beaumont
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Stanfield v. Jones et al
as 6:2024cv00172
Plaintiff:
Timothy Stanfield and Randy Jones
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Brian Collier and Unknown Loosier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Communication Interface Technologies, LLC v. Fat Brands, Inc.
as 4:2024cv00414
Plaintiff:
Communication Interface Technologies, LLC
Defendant:
Fat Brands, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Allen v. Jefferson County Jail et al
as 1:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
Brandon Lee Allen
Defendant:
Jefferson County Jail and Sheriff Zena Stephens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rabine v. Commissioner of SSA
as 6:2024cv00091
Plaintiff:
David Paul Rabine
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Solache v. Anthony et al
as 1:2024cv00159
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Solache
Defendant:
Edmead Anthony and New Prime, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Push Data LLC v. Belk, Inc.
as 4:2024cv00398
Plaintiff:
Push Data LLC
Defendant:
Belk, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
GeoSymm Ventures LLC v. ScienceSoft USA Corporation
as 2:2024cv00338
Plaintiff:
GeoSymm Ventures LLC
Defendant:
ScienceSoft USA Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
GeoSymm Ventures LLC v. Varjo Technologies Oy
as 2:2024cv00341
Plaintiff:
GeoSymm Ventures LLC
Defendant:
Varjo Technologies Oy
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
