Cases 21 - 30 of 105,168
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03470
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03473
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03474
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03472
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03464
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv02539
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00757
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Roldan v. County of Los Angeles, a public entity et al
as 2:2024cv03483
Plaintiff:
Jhonny Roldan
Defendant:
County of Los Angeles, a public entity, 168 Realty Inc., Tony Chang and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Roldan v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES et al
as 2:2024cv03485
Plaintiff:
Jhonny Roldan
Defendant:
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, 168 Realty Inc., Tony Chang and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bear v. Republic Bancorp, Inc. et al
as 8:2024cv00913
Plaintiff:
Alex Bear
Defendant:
Republic Bancorp, Inc., Republic Bank & Trust Company, CBank and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
