Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of California
Cases 21 - 30 of 26,369
Rauda
as 5:2024cv02894
Plaintiff: Anthony Rauda
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Guan v. County of San Fracisco Magistrate Company et al
as 3:2024cv02896
Plaintiff: Min Jian Guan
Defendant: County of San Fracisco Magistrate Company and San Francisco County Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia Nava v. Lundy
as 3:2024cv02808
Petitioner: Juan L. Garcia Nava
Respondent: Warden Leanna Lundy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Haywood v. Limon et al
as 3:2024cv02810
Plaintiff: Cameron L. Haywood
Defendant: Efren Limon and Ogwurumba Casmir
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. Borla
as 3:2024cv02811
Petitioner: Webster Lee
Respondent: Warden Edward Borla
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02807
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Pina v. United States
as 4:2024cv02783
Plaintiff: Andrew Jonathan Pina
Defendant: United States
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Broomfield et al
as 3:2024cv02820
Plaintiff: Tracy Taylor
Defendant: Ron Broomfield, J. Moeckly and C. Schuyler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elghembri v. California Dept. of Correction & Rehabilitation et al
as 3:2024cv02769
Plaintiff: Ahmed Mohamed Elghembri
Defendant: California Dept. of Correction & Rehabilitation and Ronald Broomfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elghembri v. Doe, Dentist et al
as 3:2024cv02771
Plaintiff: Ahmed Mohamed Elghembri
Defendant: Jane Doe, Dentist, John Doe, Dentist and Theodore Ng
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?