Cases 31 - 40 of 59,699
Mims et al v. Kalakau et al
as 2:2024cv00882
Plaintiff:
Delron Mims and Shareef Brown
Defendant:
Shentel Kalakau and DoorDash, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Crosby et al v. City of North Las Vegas et al
as 2:2024cv00880
Plaintiff:
Lavanz Crosby and Andreanai Hall
Defendant:
City of North Las Vegas, North Las Vegas Police Department, Clark County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Koerner v. Williams
as 3:2024cv00209
Plaintiff:
Kelly Koerner
Defendant:
Kenneth Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Solares et al v. AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLC
as 2:2024cv00881
Plaintiff:
Jasmine Solares and Estefania Correa
Defendant:
AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00885
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Landa v. Regal Cinemas, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00877
Plaintiff:
Rogelio Landa
Defendant:
Regal Cinemas, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Knight v. The State of Nevada et al
as 2:2024cv00878
Petitioner:
Wilbert Knight
Respondent:
The State of Nevada and Nevada Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Global Protection Corp. v. Thai Nippon Rubber Industry et al
as 2:2024cv00871
Plaintiff:
Global Protection Corp.
Defendant:
Thai Nippon Rubber Industry and TNR USA Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Trademark
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00876
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis v. Warner et al
as 2:2024cv00873
Plaintiff:
Patricia A. Davis
Defendant:
John Warner and B.C. & T., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
