Cases 31 - 40 of 217
Asphalt Recovery Specialists, Inc. et al v. Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.
as 1:2022cv01952
Plaintiff:
Asphalt Recovery Specialists, Inc., Seder Investment LLC, Steven Seder and others
Defendant:
Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. doing business as Gallagher Centennial Insurance Agency
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Walker v. Lankford
as 1:2022cv01711
Plaintiff:
Arthur Walker
Defendant:
Brandon Lankford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01592
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Title IX Educational Amendments 1992
Burnham v. Sheriff Diggens
as 1:2022cv01002
Petitioner:
Arthur Burnham
Respondent:
Diggens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burnham v. City and County of Denver et al
as 1:2022cv00865
Plaintiff:
Arthur Burnham
Defendant:
City and County of Denver and State of Colorado
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Hedge et al
as 1:2022cv00829
Plaintiff:
Arthur Moore
Defendant:
Hedge, Kim and Hodge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burnham v. Diggens
as 1:2022cv00509
Petitioner:
Arthur Burnham
Respondent:
Diggens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lomax v. No Named Defendant
as 1:2022cv00490
Petitioner:
Arthur J. Lomax
Respondent:
No Named Defendant
Defendant:
Jeff Long
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ECS Brands, Ltd. et al v. Phasex Corporation
as 1:2022cv00353
Petitioner:
ECS Brands, Ltd. and Arthur Jaffee
Respondent:
Phasex Corporation
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 304 Subpoenas
Hooks v. Lalonde et al
as 1:2022cv00074
Plaintiff:
Arthur Hooks
Defendant:
Stephaie Lalonde, Barack Obama, Michael Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
