Cases 31 - 40 of 59,948
Gilbert v. Henley et al
as 3:2024cv00245
Petitioner:
Jesse Calvin Gilbert
Respondent:
Henley and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nunn v. Ely State Prison et al
as 2:2024cv01089
Plaintiff:
Noel Nunn
Defendant:
Ely State Prison, The City of Ely, The County of White Pine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nevius v. Nevada Department of Corrections
as 2:2024cv01094
Plaintiff:
Thomas Nevius
Defendant:
Nevada Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Williams et al
as 3:2024cv00249
Plaintiff:
Evan Eugene Moore
Defendant:
Kenneth Williams, Barrett, Joseph Benson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sadler v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv01096
Plaintiff:
Kirsten Ann Sadler
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Nunn v. Ely State Prison et al
as 2:2024cv01090
Plaintiff:
Noel Nunn and Tyrone Noel Nunn
Defendant:
Ely State Prison, The City of Ely, The County of White Pine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nunn v. Ely State Prison
as 2:2024cv01091
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Noel Nunn
Defendant:
Ely State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zito v. Department of Employment, Training, and Rehabilitation et al
as 3:2024cv00244
Plaintiff:
Jordan Zito
Defendant:
Department of Employment, Training, and Rehabilitation, Tammi Riggs, Second Judicial District Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01080
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01081
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
