Cases 31 - 40 of 227
Dominguez v. Walsh et al
as 7:2022cv06443
Plaintiff:
Emily Dominguez
Defendant:
Thomas E. Walsh, II, Deidre Smith Withers, Conor Fitzgerald and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 vc Fed. Question: Violation of Constitutional Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03509
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Amaya v. Jones Lang Lasalle Americas, Inc.
as 1:2022cv04537
Plaintiff:
Yuly Amaya
Defendant:
Jones Lang Lasalle Americas, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Granados v. NYS DOCCS et al
as 1:2022cv00557
Plaintiff:
Delia Granados
Defendant:
NYS DOCCS and Lucy Lang
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lang v. Walmart Inc.
as 2:2022cv02784
Plaintiff:
Paul Lang
Defendant:
Walmart, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Lang v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP i/s/h/a Walmart Inc.
as 0:2022cv02784
Plaintiff:
Paul Lang
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP i/s/h/a Walmart Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Rodriguez v. Target Corporation
as 1:2022cv02982
Plaintiff:
Michael D Braun, Jose Rodriguez and Sherri Morris
Defendant:
Target Corporation and Lang Pharma Nutrition, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 bw Diversity -Breach of Warranty
Blount v. Apples et al
as 5:2022cv00216
Plaintiff:
Sayvion D. Blount
Defendant:
Apples, Caupaneo, Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Yunayev v. Hennessy et al
as 1:2022cv00862
Plaintiff:
Vladimir Yunayev
Defendant:
Paul J. Hennessy, David K. Jones, Robert J. Mylod, Jr. and others
Nominal Defendant:
Vroom, Inc.
McDonough v. Hennessy et al
as 1:2022cv00752
Plaintiff:
Brady McDonough
Defendant:
Paul J. Hennessy, David K. Jones, Robert J. Mylod, Jr. and others
Nominal Defendant:
Vroom, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
