Cases 31 - 40 of 84
Rodrigues v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00857
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc. and Merck Sharpe & Dohme Corp.
Plaintiff:
Danny Rodrigues
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00259
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Porter v. Rodrigues et al
as 1:2016cv00501
Plaintiff:
Andre Porter
Defendant:
Thomas V. Rodrigues, Bielic and City Holding Officer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martinez v. Major Fire Protection Corp. et al
as 1:2016cv03753
Plaintiff:
Gustavo Zavala Martinez
Defendant:
Major Fire Protection Corp. and Jose Guilherme Rodrigues
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Rodrigues v. The Incorporated Village of Mineola et al
as 2:2016cv01275
Plaintiff:
Zacarias Rodrigues
Defendant:
Scott P Strauss, The Incorporated Village of Mineola and Daniel B Whalen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Porro v. 74-39 Meat Corp. et al
as 1:2015cv06848
Defendant:
74-39 Meat Corp. and Helder Rodrigues
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Porro
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Mendes da Costa v. Marcucilli et al
as 7:2015cv08500
Plaintiff:
Jose Antonio Mendes da Costa
Defendant:
Marcucilli, Johnny Camacho, Michael Martins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodrigues v. Corona Advances, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv06815
Plaintiff:
Rick Rodrigues
Defendant:
Corona Advances, Inc., C4B LLC and Luis Orlando
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Valerio v. United States Dept. of Homeland Security
as 1:2015cv05619
Petitioner:
Francisco Javier Rodrigue Valerio
Respondent:
United States Dept. of Homeland Security
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Gatson v. F.B.I. et al
as 2:2015cv03387
Defendant:
SA Joseph J. Azzata, Bayonne Police Department, Bergen County Prosecutor's Office and others
Plaintiff:
Mr. Tokyo Gatson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
