Cases 31 - 40 of 40
Brooks v. Giambruno
as 7:2007cv11568
Plaintiff:
Joseph Brooks
Defendant:
Michael E. Giambruno
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Giannattasio v. Goord et al
as 6:2007cv06555
Plaintiff:
Gregory Giannattasio
Defendant:
Glenn Goord, Lucien LeClaire, Stephen Bernardi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Giannattasio v. Goord et al
as 1:2007cv09402
Plaintiff:
Gregory Giannattasio
Defendant:
Glenn Goord, Lucien LeClaire, Stephen Bernardi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clemons v. Department of Correctional Services et al
as 6:2007cv06435
Plaintiff:
James E. Clemons
Defendant:
Department of Correctional Services, Michael E. Giambruno and Wyoming Corr. Facility Medical
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chavis v. Giambruno
as 9:2007cv00657
Petitioner:
Michael Chavis
Respondent:
Michael Giambruno
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sealy v. Giambruno
as 1:2007cv01195
Petitioner:
Ernest Sealy
Respondent:
Michael Giambruno and Michael Giambruno
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Galvin v. Giambruno
as 1:2007cv00110
Petitioner:
Ricky Galvin
Respondent:
Michael Giambruno
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Evans v. Giambruno
as 6:2007cv06053
Petitioner:
James Evans
Respondent:
Michael Giambruno
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bush v. Goord et al
as 1:2003cv00759
Defendant:
Glen Goord , Michael Giambruno , Gerald Elmore and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Bennett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Van Gorder v. Workman, et al
as 6:2003cv06409
Plaintiff:
Fred E. Van Gorder, .
Defendant:
. Austin , Lon Wallschlaeger , Calkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
