Cases 31 - 40 of 2,311
Aurel v. Alston et al
as 1:2024cv00926
Plaintiff:
Mich Aurel
Defendant:
Lt. Alston, India White, Warden Robert Dean and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Sucik v. Warden et al
as 1:2024cv00694
Plaintiff:
Timothy Sucik
Defendant:
Warden, Asst. Warden and Chief of Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Evans v. Sgt. Upole et al
as 1:2024cv01221
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Glenn Evans
Defendant:
Sgt. Upole, Ofc. Kock, Sgt. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Walls v. Bivens et al
as 1:2024cv00699
Plaintiff:
Jachin Boaz Walls, Sr.
Defendant:
Warden Carlos Bivens, Dr. Kyle Smith, Andrea Moss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis et al v. Nines et al
as 1:2024cv00804
Plaintiff:
Brian Andrew Davis and Joan Ann Davis
Defendant:
Warden Jeff Nines, Assistant Warden Ronald Weber, Cheif of Security Bradley Butler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Hinton v. Warden
as 1:2024cv01212
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Hinton
Defendant:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Ross v. Warden
as 1:2024cv00718
Plaintiff:
Carl Javan Ross
Defendant:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. ViaPath Technologies et al
as 1:2024cv00916
Plaintiff:
Bryant Davis and Bryant Davidson
Defendant:
ViaPath Technologies, Olan Owolabi, Warden Robert Dean and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Mazyck v. Weber et al
as 1:2024cv01182
Petitioner:
Troy Mazyck
Respondent:
Warden of W.C.I. Ronald Shane Weber and Anthony Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01181
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
