Cases 31 - 40 of 110
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00384
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
LAM v. OSAKA JAPAN RESTAURANT, INC. et al
as 2:2018cv05337
Defendant:
JAMES KIM, J.H.S.K., INC., KWANG BUM KIM and others
Plaintiff:
THAI LAM
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
URDA v. DARDEN RESTAURANTS, INC.
as 2:2018cv03282
Plaintiff:
NANCY URDA
Defendant:
DARDEN RESTAURANTS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SMITH-CENTZ v. SAFRAN TURNEY HOSPITALITY et al
as 2:2018cv04055
Defendant:
SAFRAN TURNEY HOSPITALITY, GROCERY 13, INC., LOCUST 13, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
SARAH SMITH-CENTZ
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv02132
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
LOMBARDO et al v. 400 NORTH PARK ROAD ASSOCIATES et al
as 2:2018cv01870
Plaintiff:
GREGORY LOMBARDO, SR. and CAROL LOMBARDO
Defendant:
400 NORTH PARK ROAD ASSOCIATES, FIC RESTAURANTS, INC. and FRIENDLY ICE CREAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00844
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
MELL v. DARDEN RESTAURANTS, INC. et al
as 5:2018cv00248
Plaintiff:
ELLEN MELL
Defendant:
DARDEN RESTAURANTS, INC. , DARDEN RESTAURANTS OF PA MERGER CORP. and FCPT KEYSTONE PROPERTIES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BLOFSTEIN et al v. MICHAEL'S FAMILY RESTAURANT, INC. et al
as 2:2017cv05578
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE BLOFSTEIN and ALEXIS FLORES
Defendant:
MICHAEL'S FAMILY RESTAURANT, INC. , EMMANUEL PETROGIANNIS , IOANNIS PETROGIANNIS and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
SCOTLAND et al v. SH RESTAURANT, INC.
as 2:2017cv05561
Plaintiff:
TIARA SCOTLAND and JANAYA OUTERBRIDGE
Defendant:
SH RESTAURANT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
