Cases 31 - 40 of 771
Scott v. Geico General Insurance Company
as 1:2023cv00049
Plaintiff:
Sierra N. Scott, John C. Scott, C.S. and others
Defendant:
Geico General Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Hagenhoff v. Kijakazi
as 2:2023cv04055
Plaintiff:
Jason N Hagenhoff
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Hill et al
as 4:2023mc09004
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Receiver:
Albert C. Black, III
Defendant:
Roy W. Hill, Eric N. Shelly, Clean Energy Technology Association, Inc. and others
GEICO Casualty Company v. Hall
as 2:2023cv04054
Plaintiff:
GEICO Casualty Company
Defendant:
Kenneth N Hall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Erwin v. Kijakazi
as 4:2023cv00239
Plaintiff:
Gina N. Erwin
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Boyd v. Kijakazi
as 4:2023cv00142
Plaintiff:
Margaret N. Boyd
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Scott v. Geico General Insurance Company
as 4:2023cv00434
Plaintiff:
Sierra N. Scott, John C. Scott, C.S. and others
Defendant:
Geico General Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Berkley v. Tucker
as 4:2023cv00144
Plaintiff:
William F. Berkley
Defendant:
Sgt. N. Tucker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Alzu v. Huff
as 6:2023cv03022
Plaintiff:
Lucas Alzu
Respondent:
Amy N Huff
Defendant:
Amy Nichole Huff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 11601 International Child Abduction Remedies Act
Rios-Rosa v. Limbaugh et al
as 1:2023cv00002
Plaintiff:
Angel David Rios-Rosa
Defendant:
Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr. and Gregory J. Linhares
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
