Cases 31 - 40 of 901
Mendoza v. United States Of America
as 1:2024cv22952
Petitioner:
Michael Mendoza
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv22917
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01800
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv01380
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0704 Labor Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01773
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Guerra et al v. Adventhealth Palm Coast Parkway Hospital, a Florida Profit Corp. doing business in the State of Florida
as 3:2024cv00728
Plaintiff:
Ramon E Mendoza and Joseph A Guerra
Defendant:
Adventhealth Palm Coast Parkway Hospital, a Florida Profit Corp. doing business in the State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
Cartagena v. Garland et al
as 0:2024cv61271
Defendant:
Director Tracy Tarango, Alejandro Mayorkas, Merrick B. Garland and others
Plaintiff:
Carmelina Cartagena
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0551 Administrative Procedure Act
Cartagena v. Garland et al
as 0:2024cv61273
Defendant:
Director Alejandro Mayorkas, Merrick B. Garland, Director Tracy Tarango and others
Plaintiff:
Carmelina Cartagena
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv22716
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv01281
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
