Cases 31 - 40 of 100
Reagan National Advertising of Austin, Inc. v. City of Cedar Park
as 1:2017cv00717
Defendant:
City of Cedar Park
Plaintiff:
Reagan National Advertising of Austin, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Constitutional Rights
Reagan National Advertising of Austin, Inc. v. City of Austin
as 1:2017cv00673
512) 974-1311 (fax:
City of Austin
512) 499-0094 (fax:
Reagan National Advertising of Austin, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Sullivan v. United States of America
as 1:2017cv00157
Petitioner:
Reagan Meredith Sullivan
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
PCG PUBLISHING GROUP, LLC v. Lewis et al
as 5:2017cv00111
Defendant:
Melissa Blasko, Sean Blasko, Cheveux Roux, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
PCG PUBLISHING GROUP, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Reagan v. Quay
as 3:2017cv00335
Petitioner:
Darren L Reagan
Respondent:
H. Quay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Wagner v. JJM Capital LLC et al
as 3:2017cv00078
Defendant:
JJM Capital LLC, James E Hoffman, Jr and Joshua J Reagan
Plaintiff:
Shelby Wagner
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Barroso v. The State of Texas et al
as 4:2016cv03235
Plaintiff:
Richard Barroso
Defendant:
The State of Texas, Texas Department Of Criminal Justice, Correctional Managed Health Care and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Caldwell v. Furr et al
as 2:2016cv00456
Plaintiff:
Reagan James Caldwell
Defendant:
Corey Furr, James A McKee, Derek Garza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reagan v. Burns et al
as 3:2016cv02590
Plaintiff:
Darren L Reagan
Defendant:
Rickey Burns, Eddy Mejia, Abraham Chopan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McNeely v. Woods et al
as 1:2016cv00051
Plaintiff:
James A McNeely
Defendant:
Mitch Woods, UP Reagan and Kent Simms
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
