Cases 31 - 40 of 64
Cardines v. Espinda
as 1:2017cv00183
Plaintiff:
Kurt Russell Cardines
Defendant:
Nolan Espinda , Jodie Maesaka-Hirata , Peter Cabreros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NICUSA, Inc. et al v. Castagnaro et al
as 1:2017cv00031
Defendant:
Russell R. Castagnaro , Matthew J. Skoda and Wampum, LLC
Plaintiff:
NICUSA, Inc. and Hawaiian Information Consortium, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cobian v. Tsuji et al
as 1:2016cv00430
Plaintiff:
Li Cobian
Defendant:
Russell Tsuji , Barry W. Cheung and Department of Land and Natural Resources
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Palmer v. Stephens
as 1:2016cv00020
Petitioner:
Russell Wayne Palmer
Respondent:
William Stephens
Intervenor_plaintiff:
Jeremy Dale Tinti, William Louis Carey, Jr., David Lightfoot Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pitts v. Espinda et al
as 1:2015cv00483
Plaintiff:
Joseph Pitts
Defendant:
Nolan Espinda, Lyle Antonio, Department of Public Safety Sheriffs Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cohn v. Hawaiian Electric Industries, Inc.
as 1:2015cv00029
Plaintiff:
Lawrence F. Cohn
Defendant:
Hawaiian Electric Industries, Inc., NEE Acquisition Sub II, Inc, NEE Acquisition Sub I, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company v. Ramos et al
as 1:2013cv00650
Plaintiff:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Defendant:
Russell S. Ramos and Elorderly L. Ramos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00656
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Creditor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
Russell et al v. City and County of Honolulu et al
as 1:2013cv00475
Plaintiff:
Catherine Russell , Terry Anderson , (De) Occupy Honolulu and others
Defendant:
City and County of Honolulu and John Does 1-50
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
