Cases 31 - 40 of 51
McCormack v. Everest National Insurance Company et al
as 1:2013cv00318
Defendant:
Everest National Insurance Company, Christopher E Caldwell, Ronda K Nichols and others
Plaintiff:
Robert James McCormack
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. State of Idaho et al
as 1:2013cv00291
Petitioner:
Burton Wright
Respondent:
State of Idaho and Tim Wengler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mansell v. Wright et al
as 1:2013cv00137
Plaintiff:
Alan Mansell
Defendant:
Wright, Baird, Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. Basic American Foods
as 4:2013cv00125
Plaintiff:
Jack D. Wright
Defendant:
Basic American Foods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Mansell v. IDOC et al
as 1:2013cv00024
Plaintiff:
Alan Mansell
Defendant:
IDOC, ISCI and Wright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00581
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Parker et al v. Wright
as 1:2012cv00543
Counter Defendant:
Byron J Parker
Defendant:
Boise Garage Door LLC and John Wright
Plaintiff:
Ryon Parker and Byron J Parker doing business as Sunrise Garage Door
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00533
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Kendall et al v. United States of America et al
as 1:2012cv00330
Plaintiff:
Gary Kendall, Edwin Crosby III, Barbara Wright and others
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Depratment of Veterans Affairs and Eric Ken Shinseki
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Perry v. Craven et al
as 1:2012cv00130
Plaintiff:
Kevin Michael Perry
Defendant:
Olivia Craven, Brent Reinke, Johanna Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
